Kaynağa Gözat

Added tasks to every section

Min 5 yıl önce
ebeveyn
işleme
1dbcf0d1d1

+ 14 - 1
src/business_case.tex

@@ -1,2 +1,15 @@
+% !TeX root = main.tex
+\iffalse
+The purpose of the business case is to outline the Market Assessment and the Financial Summary of the project.
+* What is the business concept?
+* What are the financial requirements of product?
+* Which are the key financial points such as return on investment?
+* Can you explain the market assessment with data demographics and target markets?
+* Which are the competitors and analyses competition?
+* Which are the barriers to entry?
+* Which are the data costs and revenues
+\fi
+
 \newpage
-\section{Business Case}
+\section{Business Case}
+

+ 17 - 0
src/design_methodology_and_implementation.tex

@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+% !TeX root = main.tex
+\iffalse
+This should include background theory, justification for the design choices and any assumptions made. 
+These should relate to each IoT layer under consideration.
+Block diagrams, schematic diagrams and flowcharts are excellent illustration tools.
+This section should not include screenshots nor detailed “how-to” operations 
+(these should appear in an Appendix if necessary)
+
+* Have you identified the problem you are addressing?
+* Have you provided an overview of how you are addressing this problem?
+* Have you provided detailed steps of what you did in a logical order?
+* Have you described the methods you used to solve the problem and their purpose?
+* Have you identified the parameters for designing your system?
+* Have you identified the metrics for evaluating the performance of your system?
+* Have you used illustrations to give the reader a visual interpretation of your system?
+\if
+
 \newpage
 \section{Design Methodology and Implementation}
 

+ 22 - 0
src/engineering_trade_offs.tex

@@ -1,2 +1,24 @@
+% !TeX root = main.tex
+\iffalse
+# It is impossible to optimise all system parameter values concurrently.
+# Trade-offs $quantify$ the benefits a designer would gain in optimising one 
+performance metric at the expense of degrading a different performance metric.
+
+Have you considered $and quantified$ the cost (you will incur) versus the gain 
+(you will obtain) when you modify different parameters in your system? For example:
+* Local vs. Cloud processing.
+* Range vs. Power consumption (battery life).
+* Throughout vs. Power consumption.
+* Latency /Delay vs. Accuracy.
+* Performance vs. Security.
+* Generic vs. Bespoke hardware.
+* Price vs. Functionality.
+* Price vs. Usability.
+* Price vs. Robustness / Reliability.
+* Functionality vs. Usability.
+* Functionality vs. Rapid development (time to market).
+* Functionality vs. Backward compatibility.
+\fi
+
 \newpage
 \section{Engineering Trade-offs}

+ 11 - 0
src/executive_summary.tex

@@ -1,2 +1,13 @@
+% !TeX root = main.tex
+\iffalse
+The purpose of the executive summary is to outline the project scenario, 
+clearly define the problem under consideration and summarise the solution implemented.
+* Have you outlined the background to the problem?
+* Have you clarified the purpose of the report?
+* Have you provided brief details of the approach you followed?
+* Have you summarised the important results or findings?
+* Have you stated the major conclusion from your work?
+\fi
+
 \newpage
 \section{Executive Summary}

+ 19 - 0
src/experimental_results.tex

@@ -1,2 +1,21 @@
+% !TeX root = main.tex
+\iffalse
+Results measure the achievement of the objectives specified at the project’s outset.
+This section should include analysis and discussion of the results acquired, 
+comparing them against the original objectives and highlighting their significance.
+Plots, charts and graphs are excellent illustration tools.
+This section should not include screenshots nor pictures of the working system 
+(these should appear in an Appendix if necessary).
+
+* Every result included must have a method set out in the design methodology.
+* Likewise, every method should have some results.
+* Have you used figures and tables to illustrate your points?
+* Have you critically evaluated the quality and reliability of your results?
+* Are your observations supported by evidence?
+* Is the analysis and discussion relevant to the project and its context?
+* Have you explained how well (or not) you have met the project’s objectives?
+
+\fi
+
 \newpage
 \section{Experimental Results}